What happens when one parent needs to move, and the other objects.
Relocation is among the hardest questions in family law, because there is often no arrangement that gives both parents what they had. One parent has a genuine reason to move. The other stands to lose regular contact. The court has to choose.
A parent subject to a custody order generally cannot simply relocate with the child. Orders and agreements commonly require advance written notice to the other parent, and Maryland practice expects the issue to be raised before the move rather than after.
Moving first and seeking permission later is the single most damaging thing a parent can do in one of these cases. It reframes the question from whether the move is in the child’s interest to whether the moving parent respects the other parent’s role, and courts have the power to order a child returned.
The standard remains the best interests of the child. In a relocation case the considerations that carry the most weight tend to be:
The moving parent who arrives with a concrete, generous proposal for preserving the other parent’s relationship is in a far stronger position than one who arrives with only a reason to leave. That means specifics: extended summers and school breaks, a realistic travel plan including who pays, and regular video contact.
The objecting parent’s strongest case is usually built on their actual record of involvement, documented rather than asserted.
A relocation request is a request to change the existing arrangement, so it runs through the material change in circumstances framework. See modification of custody.
The Law Office of Thomas K. Mallon, LLC offers a free consultation. Call (410) 847-9075 or request a consultation online. The office is at 1107 Kenilworth Drive, Suite 305, Towson, MD 21204.
This page provides general information about Maryland law. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Maryland law changes, and how it applies depends on the facts of your situation.